Defending God's Existence
Overview
Defending God's Existence equips Christians with the nuclear strength of Van Tillian presuppositional apologetics to logically and biblically defend God’s existence to modern skeptics. Understand why the God of the Bible is the necessary foundation for all truth, logic, and knowledge so you can expose the inherent inconsistencies of alternative worldviews. This book is written so that even newcomers to apologetics can confidently articulate why the Christian worldview alone makes sense of reality. Perfect for believers who want to combine gentleness with intellectual rigor in gospel conversations.
Product Attachments
Product Details
| SKU | M382-7 |
|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Master Books |
| Weight (in lbs) | 0.61 |
| Title | Defending God's Existence |
| ISBN 13 | 9781683443827 |
| Contributors | Ken Ham |
| Binding | Paperback |
| Page Count | 224 |
| Publisher | New Leaf Publishing Group, LLC |
| Dimensions (in inches) | 6 x 9 |
More Information
A Fresh Take on Apologetics for a Modern World of Unbelief
Are you ready to defend your faith with intellectual rigor and biblical clarity? Defending God’s Existence by Ken Ham, offers a groundbreaking approach to apologetics, rooted in the powerful Van Tillian presuppositional method — the gold standard for defending the Christian worldview. Unlike conventional apologetic strategies that often concede human reason as the ultimate authority, this book boldly asserts that the God of the Bible and His Word are the absolute, foundational standard for all truth, logic, and knowledge.
Learn How to Address Modern Skeptics
Many Christians struggle to respond to skeptics who dismiss the Bible. This book reveals why starting with man’s fallen reasoning leads to inherent inconsistencies and ultimately fails to provide a coherent worldview. Instead, you'll learn to employ the Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God (TAG), which demonstrates that logic, morality, science, and even the possibility of knowledge itself are only intelligible because the biblical God exists. You will discover how all other worldviews borrow from the Christian worldview to make sense of the world, whether they realize it or not.
Defending God's Existence will equip you to:
- Understand why traditional apologetic methods often fall short in proving the biblical God.
- Master the nuclear strength apologetic to expose the arbitrariness, inconsistency, and lack of preconditions for intelligibility in atheistic, naturalistic, and other religious worldviews.
- Confidently affirm that the Bible is true because any alternative makes knowledge and logic impossible.
- Use evidence as a powerful confirmation of biblical truth, not as a starting point dependent on human interpretation.
- Gently and respectfully challenge humanistic thinking by revealing its foundational flaws, always pointing to God and His Word as the ultimate authority.
This book emphasizes that while apologetics can dismantle false worldviews and answer skeptical questions, the ultimate goal is to present the gospel with gentleness and respect, recognizing that it is the Holy Spirit who brings about salvation.
Accessible Yet Deep
From God’s attributes and the Trinity to comparing Scripture with other so-called holy books, this 224-page resource makes complex ideas approachable, even for newcomers to apologetics, while offering robust insights for seasoned defenders of the faith.
Prepare to transform your understanding of defending the faith and empower yourself to proclaim the truth of God's existence in a world desperately searching for meaning.
Table of Contents
Acknowledgments
Foreword
1. Introduction: The Existence of God
2. Apologetics — What Is It?
3. How to Refute (Disprove) Something
4. Abbreviated Logical Fallacies
5. Getting Started
6. Popular Apologetics Methodologies — and Their Problems
7. Other Apologetic Methods That “Fare No Better”
8. Van Til — Who Was He and What Did He Do?
9. The Powerful Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God
10. Neutrality vs. Common Ground
11. How to Use Evidence
12. Proof vs. Persuasion
13. The Disproof of Atheism
14. The Veil of a Debased Mind
15. Isn’t Starting with the Bible Circular Reasoning?
16. Where Did God Come From? Or Who Created God?
17. God’s Triune Nature
18. The “Omni’s” of God
19. The Distressing Attributes of God
20. Testing for the Ultimate Authority
21. Practical Micro-Refutations of False Worldview
22. The Bible vs. Other Alleged Holy Books
23. The Seriousness of Sin — Breaking God’s Law
Glossary of Terms
Index
Customer Reviews
1. The book fails to demonstrate how its apologetic method is grounded in Scripture. Although there are a considerable number of Bible verses cited throughout, rarely does this book engage in detailed exegesis of those verses in order to demonstrate how (allegedly) they undergird the argumentative strategy this work employs. The verses appealed to are cherrypicked, and there is scant interaction with the biblical passages used by other Christian apologists in advocating for alternative apologetic methods.
2. The book’s critiques of alternative apologetic methods often are reducible to mere caricatures. It is evident that the author has invested little effort in actually trying to understand alternative views, as he frequently oversimplifies or outright misrepresents them. The author clearly understands the strawman fallacy (and discusses it in chapter 4); but this does not stop him from repeatedly setting up grossly misrepresented versions of alternative apologetic strategies, only to easily tear them down and disparage them.
3. The book contains a large volume of content that simply is rehashed, sometimes with very little change, from earlier material published by Answers in Genesis (namely other books and web articles). Even where the book contains material that has not appeared in other Answers in Genesis publications, there is little, if any, truly innovative content that advances the case for a presuppositional apologetic method or (more importantly) the existence of the God of Scripture. In short, this work is almost entirely derivative.
4. The book is poorly written. Readers looking for the basic, relatable style present in Ken Ham’s better-known works (such as “The Lie: Evolution”) will not find it here. This book is plagued throughout by tortured sentence structure, confusing vocabulary choices, inconsistent punctuation, and overall sloppy organization. Where the book refers to other sources, bibliographical information is sometimes missing. Additionally, the content of the book has been greatly padded by quoting Bible verses, at length, in footnotes.
5. The book fails to make a meaningful contribution in its field. It does not measure up to other contemporary works on Christian apologetics by the field’s foremost scholars, such as John Feinberg and Gary Habermas. Among works by presuppositionalists, it is far outstripped by readily accessible books by John Frame, K. Scott Oliphint, and Robert Reymond. And if the reader insists on the supposed strictly “Van Tillian” approach advocated for in this book, why not just read the many apologetic works of Van Til himself, which are still in print?
Ken Ham has laid it out in an easy to understand yet very clear and direct way.
This book could easily be added to a high school morning basket or to your student’s elective reading. But I do think everybody should read this book just to get a firm grip on the why and the how behind who God is.
First, as most Presuppositional apologists do, the Word of God is the foundation for “apologetic” discussions. Ken Ham clearly shows how the Bible must be our starting point when considering various topics. Just as Hebrews 4:12 states, “For the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and of spirit, of joints and of marrow, and discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart.”
Second, I appreciate how Ken Ham reminds us that Christian apologists don’t convince people of the truth and certainly do not save people. The Holy Spirit does the drawing of the soul to God through the truth of His Word and He convinces people of where they stand before God. The Holy Spirit does the work in a person. The Christian Apologist’ job is to plant seeds of truth by defending why they believe what they believe. Ken Ham describes that many times the Christian Apologist won’t see a person be born again, but when they do, it’s possible the answers the Christian Apologist gave from the truth of God’s Word were planted or watered in the soul that was saved. Remember God gives the increase!
Third, I appreciate the history of presuppositional apologetics and the comparison to other apologetic approaches (e.g., classical, evidential, etc.). It was helpful to understand the differences between the apologetic approaches. It was also helpful to be given examples of questions one could ask with claims that are made contrary to the truth. The questions are twofold at least: 1) Understand where the person is coming from/genuinely get to know them and 2) Help the person see the error of their way.
Fourth, Ken provided several tables with key information as it relates to formal and informal logical fallacies, comparisons of other religions (e.g., Islam, Buddhism, Latter Day Saints/Mormonism, Jehovah Witnesses, Atheism, etc.) to Christianity, and example conversations on various topics. All of these are great for quick references.
Fifth, I appreciated Ken Ham’s attitude throughout the book. Many Christians don’t see the importance of apologetics and/or they have a negative perception of it. Many times, people have negative perceptions of Christian apologetics because of the person carrying the message, and especially with the Presuppositional approach. Oftentimes the Presuppositional approach comes across as “tear your house down and build it back up” such that it makes the person who is being spoken to feel stupid. Sometimes the Presuppositional apologist acts puffed up with knowledge and wisdom of various arguments, speaks down to people, and is trying to win an argument. Ken Ham goes out of his way in the book to emphasize how the Christian apologist needs to be aware of this and to ensure kindness, gentleness, and respect is used when confronting false teachings, ideas, and worldviews. The goal isn’t to win an argument, and we need to be humble. The goal is to help people see the truth so they can be saved from their sins through Jesus Christ.

